Just in case my Mum is still losing sleep, I feel I should point out that, although I’m sure there are a few different ways of solving last week’s puzzle from the Standard, Mr. Gates and I decided that in order to use 9, 2, 3, 17, 35 & 70 to make 754 you do this…
9+2=11
11 times 70 = 770
And that
3 times 17 = 51
51-35 = 16
Which should just about mean that
770-16 = 754.
So why have I written that out? After all, you’ve either figured it out yourself or lost interest right?
Well the answer is Google.
Or more accurately Google searches.
For the first time in ages I had a sneaky look at my stats today ,and right at the top of my “recent keyword activity” was that same puzzle.
Someone out there actually visited my site after specifically searching for “make 754 using 2 70 35 9 3 17”. How funny is that? They actually hit the Internet to try and find an answer to the quiz in the paper – is that at least slightly cheating more than using Excel?
I nearly choked on my cup of tea laughing.
What kind of person is so desperate to fill in their puzzle page on the way home, presumably to impress their wife with their superior intellect, that they do an emergency Google to find the answer?
Then it hit me – the kind of person who would do that is the kind of person who might just laugh at my jokes – you know, somebody with special needs! My usual target audience in fact…
So with that in mind I thought I’d quickly post up the answer in the hope of enticing him back – come back and read me Sir, next week I will be giving out the answer to 2 across and the easy Sudoku.
I’m happy to report that after seven months I am still getting many precious hits from people who have searched for “Sexy Bears”, heaven knows what they were actually looking for, were they happy or sad when they read this post do you think?
Regular hits are still coming in after searches for “Emily Blunt Topless” as well as “G-string of the day”, and I’m absolutely certain that those guys go away more than a little frustrated (and somewhat gutted if they are a bit trigger happy).
Flittner’s Barbers is still a very ‘hit’ friendly search result – which is good because that post is pretty much the only one that might actually be of use to the person that found it. I’m basing that on the fact that it was simply a review of a barber shop (yeah I don’t know how I got away with that either).
The scariest hit I ever had is still the result of a search entitled “Glen Staples wife photo”, which is just plain worrying, though she is pretty sexy at the end of the day, so you can hardly blame them.
So there it is, this is the level I am aiming at and frequently falling short of.
Ah well, que sera sera, as they say…
Did I ever tell you about photo I took the time I slept with a naked Robbie Williams?
Well I say slept, actually I mean 'met' – sorry, there may have been a typo there.
And actually, if I’m honest, Robbie wasn’t actually naked as such.
I did take a photo though, and actually I have told you about it before too – here, so I’m sorry if this hasn’t turned out to be quite as exciting as you hoped.
10 comments:
Who would look up the answer to that math question? Holy crap, man, I would!!
Well, not if someone really thought I did it.
So how do you know someone used those key words and found you? Am I the only one on the internet that doesn't know about this stuff??
Pearl
Too funny!
I've only ever checked my stats like 5 times and all in the same week back in August. Do you think there is something wrong with me? Or am I just the sort of person that doesn't care about the 754 answer? Who knows!
x
There's a part B to my comment that I forgot to add...
PART B
I will of course be going straight over to my stats right now to see what people googled to get to me. x
I am the kind of person that googles the answers to those stupid puzzles.
Mainly because I am super intelligent but time poor.
sexy bears? wtf?
Now I am even a super geek or just really interested... Dam I am a geek!!
I check my stats all the time, it might be because I am a newbie to this and I think it is great what people Google and instead my blog pops up.
In my fairytale mind I like to think they read it while they are there and fall in love with my blog... but I think the sexy bear people maybe wont enjoy it so much!
Soph x
I get hits from both "butt cancer" and "overuse of ellipses". Neither of the posts referred to is in any way informative on either of those subjects. Yet no-one lands on my blog having Googled "self-indulgent mid-thirties angst". Go figure. At least yours has the answer.
Most of my hits come from random searches about poop problems.
Maybe I should try talking about Emily Blunt topless.
That wasn't me. But ironically... that's how I found your site.
Pearl - what? How do you survive without the occasional peek? madness!
Maxabella - I had a period last year when I was looking every hour for months - obsessed. I've managed to get myself to just the one look a month now!
Toushka - I tried Googling Google - love it. and Sexy Bears - follow the link - you will love it.
Soph - live the dream - don't let us old cynics stop you checking!
Tinsenpup - Butt Cancer has to be a quality way to discover a blog!
Kev - yes but then you are marginally obsessed with poo!
Que - Somehow that just doesn't surprise me :-D
Glen, Glen, Glen. How I have missed you. I'll aim better going forward. :-)
Post a Comment